Sharpen Focus with Deep-Dive Questions

All our language assumes things. They're not necessarily ๐“ฝ๐“ป๐“พ๐“ฎ per se, it's just that simply uttering the words presupposes you at least ๐“ฌ๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ฝ๐“ฎ๐“ถ๐“น๐“ต๐“ช๐“ฝ๐“ฎ their concept.

So, if I say something like...

"As Andy looked out the balcony, he heard the vague murmur of bustling bees, felt the cool breeze, smelt the faint scent of spring flowers, he could almost taste the sweet honeycakes.

It made him realize that, whether sooner, or later, he'd just have to bake them. And it all meant he'd then set the table, invite his besties, and share with them."

I have to hold in my mind's eye that:

โ€ข there ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ such things as Andy, a balcony, bees, a breeze, a scent of spring flowers, honeycakes, a table, and Andy's besties;

โ€ข Andy sees, hears, feels, smells, and tastes;

โ€ข the murmur is vague, the breeze is cool, the scent is faint, and the hypothetical honeycakes are sweet;โ€ข they make, they ๐™˜๐™–๐™ช๐™จ๐™š him to realize...

โ€ข ... the ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™˜๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ of baking;

โ€ข he has the choice of doing it ๐™š๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง sooner, ๐™ค๐™ง later in ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ข๐™š;

โ€ข (and either way, it ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ก๐™ก happen);

โ€ข and all of it is the ๐™š๐™ฆ๐™ช๐™ž๐™ซ๐™–๐™ก๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ of...

โ€ข ... an ๐™ค๐™ง๐™™๐™š๐™ง for setting the table, inviting his besties, and sharing with them;

... and now, so do you.๐Ÿ˜‰ If you are to make sense of my message, you simply ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™š๐™™ to paint its mental picture.

And as you're doing it now, it influences how you feel, which then seeps into your behaviours, and ultimately adds up to your solid outcomes.

Once again, it doesn't mean any of the above is any more than a mere flight of fancy. But, then again, so is every notion in the world, before it pours from mind into matter, and solidifies into concrete fact.

For the Wright brothers, inventing a flying machine heavier then air was ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™–๐™ก๐™ก๐™ฎ a flight of fancy, before they could patch it together, and have it ๐™ฅ๐™๐™ฎ๐™จ๐™ž๐™˜๐™–๐™ก๐™ก๐™ฎ take off.

So, the language we use to address others (and most importantly, ourselves) precisely codifies our ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ง world, and how we then structure its ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง reflection.

Our mind constantly seeks to answer one big question: ๐™’๐™๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™๐™–๐™ก๐™ก ๐™„ ๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฎ ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฌ? The language we use, everything it assumes and presupposes hones that focus, directs its attention precisely.

For instance, the Wright brothers found it far more useful to ask themselves ๐™๐™ค๐™ฌ to build a flying machine heavier than air, and ๐™ฌ๐™๐™–๐™ฉ it took (which already presupposed success), rather than ๐™ฌ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง it was possible.

My mentor, Tad James, built on all this when he framed an overarching question, which would frame all the deep-dive questions you could most usefully ๐™–๐™จ๐™  ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ง๐™จ๐™š๐™ก๐™›:

"What's the question that, by the presuppositions embedded in the question, can produce the biggest change in myself and/or my client, by the fact that they accept its presuppositions?"

Say what? I know, it's quite a mouthful๐Ÿ˜… (or better said, a mind-ful๐Ÿ˜). So, I'll just let you mull it over.

Meanwhile, let us know in the comments - what have been some of the most useful questions you've asked yourself? And how have they boosted your problem-solving?